Home / Services / knowledge / 5.Silicon Carbide Technology /

5-5-5 SiC Insulators: Thermal Oxides and MOS Technology

5.Silicon Carbide Technology

5-5-5 SiC Insulators: Thermal Oxides and MOS Technology

2018-01-08

The vast majority of semiconductor-integrated circuit chips in use today rely on silicon metal-oxide–

semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), whose electronic advantages and operational

device physics are summarized in Katsumata’s chapter and elsewhere . Given the extreme

usefulness and success of inversion channel MOSFET-based electronics in VLSI silicon (as well as

discrete silicon power devices), it is naturally desirable to implement high-performance inversion

channel MOSFETs in SiC. Like silicon, SiC forms a thermal  when it is sufficiently heated in an

oxygen environment. While this enables SiC MOS technology to somewhat follow the highly successful

path of silicon MOS technology, there are nevertheless important differences in insulator quality and

device processing that are presently preventing SiC MOSFETs from realizing their full beneficial

potential. While the following discourse attempts to quickly highlight key issues facing SiC MOSFET

development, more detailed insights can be found in References 133–142.


From a purely electrical point of view, there are two prime operational deficiencies of SiC oxides and

MOSFETs compared to silicon MOSFETs. First, effective inversion channel mobilities in most SiC MOSFETs

are lower than one would expect based on silicon inversion channel MOSFET carrier mobilities.


This seriously reduces the transistor gain and current-carrying capability of SiC MOSFETs, so that SiC

MOSFETs are not nearly as advantageous as theoretically predicted. Second, SiC oxides have not proven

as reliable and immutable as well-developed silicon oxides, in that SiC MOSFETs are more prone to

threshold voltage shifts, gate leakage, and oxide failures than comparably biased silicon MOSFETs. In

particular, SiC MOSFET oxide electrical performance deficiencies are attributed to differences between

silicon and SiC thermal oxide quality and interface structure that cause the SiC oxide to exhibit undesirably

higher levels of interface state densities (), fixed oxide charges (),

charge trapping, carrier oxide tunneling, and lowered mobility of inversion channel carriers.

In highlighting the difficulties facing SiC MOSFET development, it is important to keep in mind that

early silicon MOSFETs also faced developmental challenges that took many years of dedicated research

efforts to successfully overcome. Indeed, tremendous improvements in 4H-SiC MOS device performance

have been achieved in recent years, giving hope that beneficial 4H-SiC power MOSFET devices for

operation up to 125°C ambient temperatures might become commercialized within the next few years.

For example, 4H-SiC MOSFET inversion channel mobility for conventionally oriented (8° off (0001)

c-axis) wafers has improved from <10 to >200 , while the density of electrically detrimental

SiC–   interface state defects energetically residing close to the conduction band edge has dropped by

an order of magnitude . Likewise, alternative SiC wafer surface orientations such as ( )

and ( ) that are obtained by making devices on wafers cut with different crystallographic orientations

(Section 5.2.1), have also yielded significantly improved 4H-SiC MOS channel properties .

One key step to obtaining greatly improved 4H-SiC MOS devices has been the proper introduction

of nitrogen-compound gases (in the form of  ) during the oxidation and postoxidation

annealing process . These nitrogen-based anneals have also improved the

stability of 4H-SiC oxides to high electric field and high-temperature stressing used to qualify and

quantify the reliability of MOSFETs . However, as Agarwal et al.  have pointed out, the wide

bandgap of SiC reduces the potential barrier impeding tunneling of damaging carriers through oxides

grown on 4H-SiC, so that 4H-SiC oxides cannot be expected to attain identical high reliability as

thermal oxides on silicon. It is highly probable that alternative gate insulators besides thermally grown

 will have to be developed for optimized implementation of inversion channel 4H-SiC insulated

gate transistors for the most demanding high-temperature and high-power electronic applications. As

with silicon MOSFET technology, multilayer dielectric stacks will likely be developed to further enhance

SiC MOSFET performance .

Contact Us

If you would like a quotation or more information about our products, please leave us a message, will reply you as soon as possible.
   
Contact Us Contact Us 
If you would like a quotation or more information about our products, please leave us a message, will reply you as soon as possible.